Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Garcia Jimenez v. Garland
as 24-1932
Petitioner:
EDY LEONEL GARCIA JIMENEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cabeza, Leonel v. United States Of America
as 1:2024cv20787
Plaintiff:
Leonel Garcia Cabeza
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Rodriguez v Val Verde Detention Center, et al
as 2:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
Julian Rodriguez, Jr
Defendant:
U.S. District Court - Western District of Texas, Unnamed Government Agents, Val Verde Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v Val Verde Detention Center, et al
as 6:2023cv00072
Plaintiff:
Julian Rodriguez, Jr
Defendant:
U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas, Unnamed Government Agents, Val Verde Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Leonel Cabeza
as 22-10665
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
LEONEL GARCIA CABEZA
Garcia Martinez v. Garland
as 22-57
Petitioner:
LEONEL GARCIA MARTINEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Santos Leonel Garcia v. Patrick Covello
as 2:2021cv07571
Petitioner:
Santos Leonel Garcia
Respondent:
Patrick Covello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
USA v. Leonel Garcia
as 20-40850
Defendant / Appellant:
Leonel Garcia
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Garcia v. Decker
as 20-1649
Respondent:
Chad F. Wolf, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Thomas Decker, in his official capacity as Field Office Director, New York City Field Office, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and William P. Barr, in his official capacity as Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice
Petitioner:
Oscar Leonel Garcia
Leonel Garcia-Avila v. William Barr, U. S. Atty Gen
as 20-60406
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner:
LEONEL GARCIA-AVILA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
