Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Cristal Yanete Morales-Flores v. Christian Lepe
as 2:2026cv05990
Petitioner:
Cristal Yanete Morales-Flores
Respondent:
Christian Lepe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv03790
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Amari Sams v. Warden Lepe
as 2:2026cv05759
Petitioner:
Amari Sams
Respondent:
Warden Lepe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
David Nunez-Hernandez v. Lepe
as 2:2026cv05902
Petitioner:
David Nunez-Hernandez
Respondent:
Lepe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv05269
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Lepe et al v. Birge et al
as 2:2026cv03268
Plaintiff:
Julian Lopez Lepe and Barbara Gisel Esparza Lopez
Defendant:
Stephanie Birge, Unknown Birge and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Carl Clarke v. Warden Lepe
as 2:2026cv05141
Petitioner:
Carl Clarke
Respondent:
Warden Lepe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Alexander Smith v. Warden Lepe
as 2:2026cv05142
Petitioner:
Alexander Smith
Respondent:
Warden Lepe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv04316
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Ronnie Robertson v. Lepe
as 2:2026cv03612
Petitioner:
Ronnie Robertson
Respondent:
Lepe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
