Cases 1 - 10 of 132
Finch v. Hollingsworth et al
as 4:2023cv00834
Plaintiff:
Elliott Finch, Jr
Defendant:
Terri Hollingsworth, Eric Higgins, Leslie Rutledge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randall McArty v. Daniel Turner, et al
as 22-3299
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Randall Thomas McArty
Defendant / Appellee:
Daniel Odell Turner, Prosecuting Attorney, Clark County, Arkansas and Leslie Rutledge, Arkansas Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv01072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Rutledge
as 4:2022cv01074
Plaintiff:
Brian James Hicks
Defendant:
Leslie Rutledge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Payne et al
as 6:2022cv06110
Petitioner:
Doyle Anthony Jones
Respondent:
Dexter Payne and Leslie Rutledge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marcum v. Capp et al
as 2:2022cv02160
Plaintiff:
Ronald Marcum
Defendant:
Sarah Capp, Abby Yarbrough, David Saxon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCoy v. Gorman et al
as 4:2022cv00682
Plaintiff:
Terry Lamar McCoy
Defendant:
Joseph Gorman, Lafayette Woods, Jr and Leslie Rutledge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Meints v. Rutledge et al
as 2:2022cv00125
Plaintiff:
Meggan Meints
Defendant:
Leslie Rutlegedge, Dexter Payne, East Arkansas Central Arkansas Community Corrections Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harmon v. Noel-Emsweller et al
as 4:2022cv00629
Plaintiff:
Henry A Harmon
Defendant:
Kayla Noel-Emsweller, Dexter Payne, Soloman Graves and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Griffin et al
as 4:2022cv00634
Plaintiff:
Brian James Hicks
Defendant:
Joe Griffin, James Moody, Dexter Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
