Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Basil Lewis, Jr. v. Phil Knight, et al
as 23-5147
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BASIL WARREN LEWIS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
PHIL KNIGHT, Owner, Nike, Inc., MICHAEL JORDAN BRAND and TINKER HATFIELD, Designer
Hill et al v. Doe et al
as 3:2016cv00104
Plaintiff:
Wendy Hill , Alice Hill , AH and others
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe, Officer Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Carmen Amis v. James Twardesky, et al
as 14-2449
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARMEN AMIS
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES TWARDESKY, BRADLEY ADKINS, WILLIAM BECHILL and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-5226
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amis v. Twardesky et al
as 2:2013cv10560
Plaintiff:
Carmen Amis
Defendant:
James Twardesky , Bradley Adkins , William Bechill and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00633
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Man Lewis, Jr. v. Patricia Caruso, et al
as 11-2117
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MAN LEWIS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICIA CARUSO, SANDRA GRANT, DIANA JUDGE and others
Joe Lewis, Jr., et al v. Laurel County Sheriff's Depart, et al
as 11-6028
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOE C. LEWIS, JR. and DALTON BREWER
Defendant - Appellee:
LAUREL COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and RICHARD SAPCUT, Individually and Officially
Lewis et al v. Laurel County Sheriff's Department et al
as 6:2009cv00280
Plaintiff:
Joe C. Lewis, Jr. and Dalton Brewer
Defendant:
Laurel County Sheriff's Department and Richard Sapcut
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones et al v. Wittenberg et al
as 3:1970cv00388
Plaintiff:
Charles Jones, David Lewis, Jr., Leonard Mayne, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Sol Wittenberg, William Gernheuser, James Holzemer and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
