Cases 11 - 20 of 51
Lewis v. USA
as 1:2016cv00870
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Scott C. Lewis, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Long et al v. Top Line Express, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00589
Plaintiff:
Robert Long and Cathy Long
Defendant:
Top Line Express, Inc. , Leszek Grabinski , Roger Stone and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vireo Systems, Inc. v. HTG Ventures, LLC, et al
as 16-5232
Plaintiff - Appellee:
VIREO SYSTEMS, INC.
Defendant:
HTG VENTURES, LLC, JOHN T. LEWIS, JR. and TIMOTHY KENSINGER
Intervenor - Appellant:
PROMERA HEALTH, LLC
Hill et al v. Doe et al
as 3:2016cv00104
Plaintiff:
Wendy Hill , Alice Hill , AH and others
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe, Officer Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Clouser v. Top Line Express, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv01795
Plaintiff:
Andrew B. Clouser
Defendant:
Top Line Express, Inc., Leszek Grabinski, Roger Stone and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vireo Systems, Inc. v. HTG Ventures, LLC et al
as 3:2014cv02359
Plaintiff:
Vireo Systems, Inc.
Defendant:
HTG Ventures, LLC , John T. Lewis, Jr. and Timothy Kensinger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carmen Amis v. James Twardesky, et al
as 14-2449
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARMEN AMIS
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES TWARDESKY, BRADLEY ADKINS, WILLIAM BECHILL and others
Lewis v. Gupton et al
as 2:2014cv02866
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Lewis, Jr.
Defendant:
William J. Gupton, Jr. and SCDC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Shelby County Division of Corrections et al
as 2:2014cv02867
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Lewis, Jr.
Defendant:
Shelby County Division of Corrections, William J. Gupton, Jr. and Hardy Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Gupton et al
as 2:2014cv02808
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Lewis, Jr.
Defendant:
William J. Gupton, Jr. and Shelby County Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
