Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Lewis, Jr. v. Black
as 1:2023cv01627
Petitioner:
Gregory J. Lewis, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Kenneth Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Heyward et al v. Cooper et al
as 3:2019cv02499
Defendant:
Ibrahim Abdulrahim Al-Hagg, Dr. B. Potts, K. Riehle and others
Plaintiff:
Victor Cooper, Mathew May, Mark White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Merlak
as 4:2017cv01242
Petitioner:
Walter Lewis, Jr.
Respondent:
Steven Merlak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Kelsey et al v. Grabinski et al
as 3:2017cv00122
Plaintiff:
Sean Kelsey , Frances Kelsey , Mary Kelsey and others
Defendant:
Leszek Grabinski, Roger Stone, Grzegorz Budnik and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lewis v. Kuka Toledo Production Operations, LLC
as 3:2016cv02280
Plaintiff:
Raymond H. Lewis, Jr.
Defendant:
Kuka Toledo Production Operations, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661
Lewis v. USA
as 1:2016cv00870
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Scott C. Lewis, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Long et al v. Top Line Express, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00589
Plaintiff:
Robert Long and Cathy Long
Defendant:
Top Line Express, Inc. , Leszek Grabinski , Roger Stone and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hill et al v. Doe et al
as 3:2016cv00104
Plaintiff:
Wendy Hill , Alice Hill , AH and others
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe, Officer Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Clouser v. Top Line Express, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv01795
Plaintiff:
Andrew B. Clouser
Defendant:
Top Line Express, Inc., Leszek Grabinski, Roger Stone and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lewis, Jr. v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution et al
as 2:2012cv00573
Plaintiff:
Donald R. Lewis, Jr.
Defendant:
Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution, Alice Ault, ALP Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
