Cases 1 - 10 of 6,154
Williams v. Steadman et al
as 3:2024cv00816
Plaintiff:
Shadale Lewis Williams
Defendant:
Terrance Steadman, Fred Sedighi, K. Franco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Reece Lewis v. Whitestone Home Furnishings LLC
as 2:2024cv03788
Plaintiff:
Reece Lewis
Defendant:
Whitestone Home Furnishings LLC doing business as Saatva
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
The Sprouted Brain LLC v. Sprouted Coffee LLC et al
as 8:2024cv00957
Plaintiff:
The Sprouted Brain LLC
Defendant:
Sprouted Coffee LLC, Blake Lewis and Does inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Lewis County v City of Chehalis
as 3:2024cv05333
Plaintiff:
Lewis County
Defendant:
City of Chehalis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lewis-Price & Associates, Inc. v. Grey Ghost, LLC
as 2:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
Lewis-Price & Associates, Inc.
Defendant:
Grey Ghost, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Mason Lewis v. City of Manhattan Beach et al
as 2:2024cv03479
Plaintiff:
Mason Lewis
Defendant:
City of Manhattan Beach, Shawn Thompson, Steve Kitsios and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lewis v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv02328
Plaintiff:
Caroline Elizabeth Lewis
Defendant:
Meta Platforms, Inc., Instagram, LLC, Facebook Payments, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Lewis et al v. Future Motion, Inc.
as 5:2024cv02287
Plaintiff:
Seth Lewis and Ashley Lewis
Defendant:
Future Motion, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Daniels v. Arnold, et al.
as 24-2365
Plaintiff:
TED DARNELL DANIELS
Defendant:
ERIC ARNOLD, MARIANNA LOTERSZTAIN, M. DE LA VEGA and others
Daniels v. Arnold, et al.
as 24-2358
Plaintiff:
TED DARNELL DANIELS
Defendant:
ERIC ARNOLD, MARIANNA LOTERSZTAIN, M. DE LA VEGA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
