Personal Injury- Product Liability Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Turkatte v. Louisville Panels. LLC,
as 4:2024cv00071
Defendant: Louisville Panels. LLC, A Kentucky limited liability company doing business as Fischersips formerly known as Fischerips, LLC and Fischerips, LLC
Plaintiff: Larisa A. Turkatte
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Justice Farms of North Carolina, LLC v. Claas of America, Inc.
as 24-1194
Plaintiff: JUSTICE FARMS OF NORTH CAROLINA, LLC and STARR INDEMNITY & LIABILITY COMPANY
Defendant: CLAAS OF AMERICA, INC.
In re: Aqueous Film-Forming Foams Products
as 24-1077
Not Yet Classified: In re: AQUEOUS FILM-FORMING FOAMS PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff: PLAINTIFFS
Defendant: DEFENDANTS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, NATIONAL FOAM, INCORPORATED and others
Appellant: TOWN OF EAST HAMPTON, TOWN OF HARRIETSTOWN, NEW YORK and TOWN OF ISLIP, NEW YORK
Olds et al v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 1:2019cv02808
Defendant: SMITH & NEPHEW BIRMINGHAM HIP RESURFACING (BHR) HIP IMPLANT PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION and Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Plaintiff: Carla M Olds and John G Olds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gordon v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 1:2019cv02687
Defendant: SMITH & NEPHEW BIRMINGHAM HIP RESURFACING (BHR) HIP IMPLANT PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION and Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Plaintiff: Sandra Gordon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 1:2019cv00475
Plaintiff: Margaret Miller
Defendant: SMITH & NEPHEW BIRMINGHAM HIP RESURFACING (BHR) HIP IMPLANT PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION and Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In Re Aqueous Film-Forming Foams Products Liability Litigation MDL 2873
as 2:2018mn02873
In Re: Aqueous Film-Forming Foams Products Liability Litigation
Defendant: Tyco Fire Products LP, Chemguard Inc, Defendants Co-Lead Counsel and others
Plaintiff: Plaintiffs Co-Lead Counsel, Plaintiffs Liaison Counsel, Plaintiffs and others
Intervenor: Lower Passaic River Study Area Cooperating Parties Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Culver et al v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 1:2018cv03634
Plaintiff: Mayra Culver and Charles Culver
Defendant: SMITH & NEPHEW BIRMINGHAM HIP RESURFACING (BHR) HIP IMPLANT PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION and Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schuett v. In re: Smith & Nephew Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation
as 1:2018cv02975
Defendant: Smith & Nephew Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation, In re: Smith & Nephew Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation and Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Plaintiff: David Schuett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
v. Schuett et al
as 1:2018cv02974
Defendant: David Schuett and In re: Smith & Nephew Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?