Cases 11 - 20 of 346
Lamar v. Joswick et al
as 3:2023cv50334
Plaintiff:
Randy Lamar
Defendant:
City of Savanna Police Officers/ Lieutenants Shea Joswick, Nicholas Meeker and DNR Trooper Hofftender
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Green v. McComas et al
as 3:2023cv03006
Plaintiff:
Jewel Green
Defendant:
James B McComas, Chris Buhr, Dobbs Tire & Auto and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Lyons v. Wills et al
as 3:2023cv02801
Plaintiff:
Martin Lyons
Defendant:
Anthony Wills, Kevin Reichert, Sara McClure and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lomeli v. Wills et al
as 3:2023cv02518
Plaintiff:
Luis A. Lomeli
Defendant:
Anthony Wills, Schanz, C/O Bohnert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoskins v. Dart et al
as 1:2023cv03076
Plaintiff:
Joshua Hoskins
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Cintron, Sheehan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rosario v. Williams et al
as 1:2023cv02726
Plaintiff:
Matthew Rosario
Defendant:
Lieutenant Williams, Correctional Officer Flemings, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tolbert v. Dart et al
as 1:2023cv01432
Plaintiff:
Tolbert Jacob and Jacob Tolbert
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Lieutenant Latham, Officer Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haywood v. Haselmeyer et al
as 3:2023cv00203
Plaintiff:
Donald Haywood
Defendant:
Major Haselmeyer, Jackie Stveve, Counselor/Officer Phelps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murillo v. AUSP Thomson/SMU et al
as 3:2023cv50009
Plaintiff:
Marco Antonio Murillo
Defendant:
AUSP Thomson/SMU, Cruze, Unknown Lieutenant and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Walton et al v. Dart et al
as 1:2022cv05617
Plaintiff:
Brandon Walton
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Cook County, Sergeant Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
