Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 57
Chen v. Garland
as 23-1211
Petitioner: XIAN LIN CHEN
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01726
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01118
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00241
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Purple Innovation v. Bedmate-U et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00620
Plaintiff: Purple Innovation
Defendant: Bedmate-U, Chuang Fan Handicraft, Dongguan Bounce Technology and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04553
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03789
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv03646
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Neri v. Abi Japanese Restaurant, Inc.
as 22-227
Plaintiff / Appellee: Marcos Leon Neri, on behalf of himself and all other persons similarly situated and Emilio Islas Concha
Defendant: John Does, #1-10
Defendant / Appellant: Abi Japanese Restaurant, Inc., DBA Abi Sushi, Abumi Japanese Cuisine Inc. and Kun Lin Chen
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv01212
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?