Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Miller et al v. Kaiser Gypsum Company, Inc., et al
as 3:2020cv00044
Plaintiff:
Donald E Miller and Linda S Miller
Defendant:
Kaiser Gypsum Company, Inc., SPX Cooling Technologies, Inc., Individually and as Successor In Interest to Marley Cooling Tower Company, Simpsons Timber Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McConnell et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2019cv09365
Plaintiff:
Leah Croxton, Viengxay Medina, David Prinster and others
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., PTI Union, LLC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McConnell et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 4:2018cv02083
Plaintiff:
Leah Croxton, Viengxay Medina, David Prinster and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc., Imerys Talc America, Inc., Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vocational Consultants, LTD et al v. H & R Block Tax Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv00092
Plaintiff:
Vocational Consultants, LTD , Linda S. Miller and Rita M. Stephens
Defendant:
H & R Block Tax Services, Inc. , Walnut Business Center, LLC and David E. Freedheim
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Vocational Consultants, LTD et al v. H & R Block Tax Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01138
Plaintiff:
Vocational Consultants, LTD , Linda S. Miller and Rita M. Stephens
Defendant:
H & R Block Tax Services, Inc. , Walnut Business Center, LLC and David E. Freedheim
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Miller v. Astrue
as 1:2010cv00159
Plaintiff:
Linda S. Miller
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
United States of America v. Miller et al
as 1:2008cv00185
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Linda S. Miller and Any Tenants or Occupants
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
