Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Linda Sanders v. Social Security Admin.
as 20-12488
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LINDA SANDERS
Defendant / Appellee:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, COMMISSIONER
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv02731
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
In Re Application for Order Enforcing a Subpoena
as 1:2015mc91096
Plaintiff:
Linda Sanders
Defendant:
RBS Citizens, N.A.
Sanders v. RBS Citiziens, N.A.
as 1:2015cv02921
Plaintiff:
Linda Sanders
Defendant:
RBS Citiziens, N.A.
Movant:
Global Credit & Collection Corp
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Sanders et al v. RBS Citizens, N.A.
as 2:2015mc00008
Defendant:
RBS Citizens, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Linda Sanders and Dorothy McQueen
Movant:
Regional Adjustment Bureau, Inc.
Sanders et al v. RBS Citizens, N.A.
as 3:2013cv03136
Plaintiff:
Linda Sanders and Dorothy McQueen
Defendant:
RBS Citizens, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brandy Tellez v. USDC-CALA
as 12-73610
:
In re: BRANDY VEGA TELLEZ
Petitioner:
BRANDY VEGA TELLEZ
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Real Party In Interest:
LINDA SANDERS, Warden
Ismael Schmidt v. The State of Washington, et al
as 11-57008
Petitioner - Appellant:
ISMAEL SCHMIDT
Respondent - Appellee:
THE STATE OF WASHINGTON and LINDA SANDERS
Robert Dean Ellsworth v. Linda Sanders
as 2:2011cv09008
Petitioner:
Robert Dean Ellsworth
Respondent:
Linda Sanders
Percy Pearce v. USDC-CAOAK
as 11-72467
:
In re: PERCY JAMES PEARCE
Petitioner:
PERCY JAMES PEARCE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND
Real Party In Interest:
BENJAMIN J. BLANKENSHIP, Senior United States Probation Officer, PAUL S. RENOIS, Senior United States Probation Officer and LINDA SANDERS, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
