Cases 1 - 10 of 667
Larry Johnson, Sr. v. Lee Coffee, et al
as 24-5468
Defendant:
WILLIAM LEE, (Bill). Former Clerk of Court. In individual and official capacity, WILLIAM LOCKHART GIBBONS, JR., District Attorney General. In individual and official capacity., LEE V. COFFEE, Assistant District Attorney (former). In individual and official capacity. and others
Plaintiff:
LARRY D. JOHNSON, SR.
Parker v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv00895
Plaintiff:
Christopher L Parker
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Unknown IDOC Directors, Rob Jeffreys and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burns v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2023cv01797
Plaintiff:
Shaune Burns
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Lisa Madigan, John Baldwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kendrick Hughes, Sr. v. Lisa Madigan
as 22-2459
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENDRICK LEE HUGHES, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
LISA MADIGAN
Jaglicic v. Foxx et al
as 1:2022cv03319
Plaintiff:
Eric Jaglicic
Defendant:
Kim Foxx, Kwame Raoul, Lisa Madigan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Hughes v. Madigan et al
as 1:2022cv01493
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Lee Hughes, Sr
Defendant:
Lisa Madigan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Coffee et al
as 2:2022cv02155
Plaintiff:
Larry D. Johnson, Sr.
Defendant:
Lee Vester Coffee, Aurthur Thomas Bennett, Gwendolyn Rooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SNIPES v. PALLMEYER et al
as 1:2021cv01625
Defendant:
MICHAEL DUGGAN, JAMES B. ZAGEL, JANE DOES and others
Plaintiff:
LEON SNIPES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smock v. Madigan et al
as 3:2021cv00346
Petitioner:
Lenard Alfred Smock, Jr
Defendant:
Randy Nyberg, Whipper Johnson, Lisa Madigan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Simmons v. Madigan et al
as 1:2021cv01189
Plaintiff:
Jake Simmons
Defendant:
Michael Kress, Mary Ellen Murphy, Lisa Madigan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.