Cases 1 - 10 of 20
LITTLEJOHN v. BARLETT
as 1:2024cv00056
Petitioner:
DONTA D. LITTLEJOHN
Respondent:
WARDEN S. BARLETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
LOWE-LITTLEJOHN v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2023cv04558
Plaintiff:
RENEE JOANN LOWE-LITTLEJOHN
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
LITTLEJOHN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2022cv04678
Plaintiff:
MELISSA LITTLEJOHN
Defendant:
Acting Comm'r o KILOLO KIJAKAZI and COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
LITTLEJOHN, v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2021cv01933
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP., and MERCK & CO., INC.
Plaintiff:
SUSAN LITTLEJOHN,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv04965
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
ROMERO et al v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2003cv06872
Plaintiff:
GENE R. ROMERO, JAMES T. BEVER, ROGER T. BOYD and others
Defendant:
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 633 Job Discrimination (Age)
LITTLEJOHN v. VIVINT SOLAR
as 2:2018mc00059
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS LITTLEJOHN
Defendant:
VIVINT SOLAR
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Type:
Other Statutes
LITTLEJOHN v. PHILADELPHIA MARRIOTT
as 2:2017cv01595
Plaintiff:
CHERITA LITTLEJOHN
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA MARRIOTT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
I.Z. v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2017cv01517
Plaintiff:
I.Z.
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, BLANCHE CARNEY, MICHELE FARRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
L.R. v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2014cv01787
Plaintiff:
L.R.
Defendant:
SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA , SCHOOL REFORM COMMISSION OF THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA and REGINALD M. LITTLEJOHN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
