Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05477
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Save the Colorado, et al v. USDOI, et al
as 23-15247
Plaintiff / Appellant: SAVE THE COLORADO, LIVING RIVERS and CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Defendant / Appellee: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and DEB HAALAND, Secretary of the Interior
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: COLORADO RIVER ENERGY DISTRIBUTORS ASSOCIATION, STATE OF NEVADA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Center for Biological Diversity, et al v. United States Forest Service, et al
as 22-1237
Petitioner: Center for Biological Diversity, Living Rivers, Sierra Club and others
Respondent: United States Forest Service and United States of America
DAKOTA RESOURCE COUNCIL et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv01853
Plaintiff: DAKOTA RESOURCE COUNCIL, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, LIVING RIVERS and others
Defendant: DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, DEBRA HAALAND, BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT and others
Not Classified By Court: STATE OF UTAH, STATE OF MONTANA, STATE OF OKLAHOMA and others
Intervenor Defendant: STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Center for Biological Diversity, et al v. STB, et al
as 22-1020
Petitioner: Center for Biological Diversity, Living Rivers, Sierra Club and others
Respondent: Surface Transportation Board, United States Fish and Wildlife Service and United States of America
Center for Biological, et al v. US Department of the Interior, et al
as 21-4098
Plaintiff / Appellant: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, LIVING RIVERS, COLORADO RIVERKEEPER and others
Defendant / Appellee: US DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and US BUREAU OF RECLAMATION
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: WASHINGTON COUNTY WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT
Intervenor: STATE OF UTAH and UTAH BOARD OF WATER RESOURCES
Save The Colorado, et al v. Spellmon, et al
as 21-1155
Petitioner / Appellant: LIVING RIVERS, a nonprofit corporation, THE ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP, a Colorado nonprofit corporation, SAVE THE COLORADO, a Colorado nonprofit corporation and others
Respondent / Appellee: LIEUTENANT GENERAL SCOTT A SPELLMON, in his official capacity as the Chief of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, MARTHA WILLIAMS, in her official capacity as the Principal Deputy Director, exercising the authority of Acting Director of the U.S. Fish and WIldlife Service and DEBRA HAALAND, in her offical capacity as Secretary of the Interior
Intervenor / Appellee: CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, acting by and through its Board of Water Commissioners (Denver Water)
Save The Colorado, et al v. United States, et al
as 21-1036
Plaintiff / Appellant: SIERRA CLUB, WILDEARTH GUARDIANS, SAVE THE POUDRE: POUDRE WATERKEEPER and others
Defendant / Appellee: COLORADO RIVER WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION and UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: MUNICIPAL SUBDISTRICT, NORTHERN COLORADO WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT, CITY AND COUNTY OF BROOMFIELD COLORADO and COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
SOUTHERN UTAH WILDERNESS ALLIANCE et al v. BERNHARDT et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv03654
Plaintiff: LIVING RIVERS, NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and others
Defendant: DAVID BERNHARDT, KENT HOFFMAN and WILLIAM PERRY PENDLEY
Intervenor Defendant: PURE HELIUM, LLC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Center for Biological Diversity et al v. US Department of the Interior et al
as 2:2019cv00636
Defendant: US Bureau of Reclamation and US Department of the Interior
Plaintiff: Living Rivers, Utah Rivers Council, Colorado Riverkeeper and others
Petitioner: Utah Board of Water Resources and State of Utah
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?