Cases 1 - 10 of 180
Busch v. Lloyds Underwriter Syndicate No. 4444 CNP A12055BAA et al
as 5:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
Kurt Busch
Defendant:
Lloyds Underwriter Syndicate No. 4444 CNP A12055BAA, Lloyds Underwriter Syndicate No. AXS 16863410716121PA, Lloyds Underwriter Syndicate No. HAM 4000 Z1167E21A000 and others
Wade v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00520
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Allen Wade
Defendant:
United States of America
LEWIS v. SURBHI
as 1:2024cv00389
Plaintiff:
LLOYD T. LEWIS
Defendant:
MD JANE SURBHI and NICOLE R. RAINES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McElwee v. Aldersgate Life Plan Services, Inc et al
as 3:2024cv00288
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lloyd McElwee and Kenneth L. McElwee
Defendant:
Aldersgate Life Plan Services, Inc, Aldresgate United Methodist Retirement Community, Inc., William Springs and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Thomas v. Pate et al
as 5:2024ct03099
Plaintiff:
Daniel Isaiah Thomas
Defendant:
Lt. Pate, Robeson County, Burnis Wilkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lloyd v. United States Of America
as 7:2024cv00151
Plaintiff:
James Ernest Lloyd
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Curtis v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00131
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Wayne Curtis
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Thomas v. USA
as 3:2024cv00122
Petitioner:
Matthew Lloyd Thomas
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
GRANTZ v. USA
as 1:2024cv00009
Petitioner:
TYLER LLOYD GRANTZ
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Kidd-Gilchrist v. Lloyd's Underwriters
as 3:2023cv00638
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Kidd-Gilchrist
Defendant:
Lloyd's Underwriters and Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
