Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Dean v. Cochise County Sheriff's Department et al
as 4:2019cv00357
Defendant: Mark A Suagee, Lori Zucco, Wallace R Hoggatt and others
Plaintiff: Thomas Lloyd Dean
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dean v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2016cv00709
Petitioner: Lloyd Dean
Respondent: Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dean v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2016cv00261
Petitioner: LLoyd Dean
Respondent: Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dean v. Warden
as 6:2016cv00073
Petitioner: LLoyd Dean
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dean v. Warden
as 3:2016cv00088
Petitioner: LLoyd Dean
Respondent: Warden, Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dean v. Warden We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2016cv00073
Petitioner: LLoyd Dean
Respondent: Secreatry, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Clayton v. Stephens Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2013cv03368
Petitioner: Lloyd Dean Clayton
Respondent: William Stephens Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Clayton v. Stephens Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2013cv00442
Petitioner: Lloyd Dean Clayton
Respondent: William Stephens Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lloyd Clayton v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 12-51090
Petitioner - Appellant: LLOYD DEAN CLAYTON
Respondent - Appellee: RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Clayton v. Quarterman
as 5:2009cv00402
Petitioner: Lloyd Dean Clayton
Respondent: Nathaniel A. Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?