Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01923
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01617
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv03407
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
TIBURON LOCKERS, INC. v. NORTHGATE DIGITAL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2015cv05050
Plaintiff:
TIBURON LOCKERS, INC.
Defendant:
NORTHGATE DIGITAL CORPORATION and SETH JASLOW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01000
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
MUNSON v. THE 23RD & 24TH ORGEN SHOPPING PLAZA BURGER KING et al
as 2:2015cv01496
Plaintiff:
PAUL MUNSON
Defendant:
THE 23RD & 24TH ORGEN SHOPPING PLAZA BURGER KING, KICKS USA, MODELS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VIZANT TECHNOLOGIES, LLC v. FOOT LOCKER CORPORATE SERVICES, INC.
as 2:2014cv06687
Plaintiff:
VIZANT TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Defendant:
FOOT LOCKER CORPORATE SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VIZANT TECHNOLOGIES, LLC v. FOOT LOCKER CORPORATE SERVICES, INC.
as 2:2014cv04590
Plaintiff:
VIZANT TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Defendant:
FOOT LOCKER CORPORATE SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FONTROY v. OWENS et al
as 3:2012cv00227
Plaintiff:
DERRICK DALE FONTROY, I
Defendant:
DAVID S OWENS, JOHN DOE, JOHN E. WETZEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN et al v. FOOT LOCKER, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv04268
Plaintiff:
HALLIE BROWN , DAVID CHEATHAM, JR. , ERIC GUZMAN and others
Defendant:
FOOT LOCKER, INC. and FOOT LOCKER RETAIL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
