Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Adams v. Louisiana Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv01672
Plaintiff:
Corey Marquee Adams
Defendant:
Louisiana Department of Corrections, Louisiana State Penitentiary, Tim Hooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hatcher v. Robichaux et al
as 3:2022cv00870
Plaintiff:
Rodney Hatcher
Defendant:
Logan Robichaux, Michael Lollis and James Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brewer v. Hueing et al
as 3:2022cv00599
Plaintiff:
Keith Brewer
Defendant:
Unknown Hueing and Unknown Lollis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christof v. Demars et al
as 3:2022cv00216
Plaintiff:
Hennessy Christof
Defendant:
Shannon Demars, Nicholas Sanders, Grady Gagnard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Louisiana Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2022cv00020
Plaintiff:
Corey Marquee Adams
Defendant:
Louisiana Department of Corrections, Michael Howard, Chad Darbonne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Youngblood v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2021cv00097
Defendant:
D. Vannoy, Chad Oakabee, Peter Lollis and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Youngblood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Agujar v. Livingston Parish Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2020cv00892
Defendant:
Lolly Kemp Hospital and Livingston Parish Sheriff's Department
Plaintiff:
Arnold Agujar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnes v. Vanoy et al
as 3:2019cv00764
Defendant:
Darryl Vanoy, John Doe, John Maples and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Barnes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Milow v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2019cv00717
Defendant:
Antonio Whitaker, John Doe, Peter Lollis and others
Plaintiff:
Dante L Milow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Landry v. Thompson et al
as 3:2019cv00520
Plaintiff:
John Landry
Defendant:
G Thompson, Unknown Houston, Unknown Lollis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
