Cases 1 - 10 of 28
BEY-UR v. BARR et al
as 2:2023cv02696
Plaintiff:
KAWFI HEWRU BEY-UR and KWAFI HERU BEY-UR
Defendant:
WILLIAM BARR and REGINA LOMBARDO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01229
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Mawson v. Diaz et al
as 3:2020cv02289
Defendant:
Hiring Supervisors, Mike Lombardo, Gilbert William Diaz and others
Plaintiff:
Robert William Mawson, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRICE v. NEW CASTLE POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2020cv01274
Defendant:
OFFICER RICHARD CONTI, NEW CASTLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, OFFICER MARK MANOS and others
Plaintiff:
JAYLA PRICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Range v. LOMBARDO
as 5:2020cv03488
Plaintiff:
Bryan David Range
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL WILLIAM BARR, REGINA LOMBARDO and WILLIAM BARR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
EL v. KOOB et al
as 1:2020cv02549
Defendant:
OCEAN CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, DONALD J. LOMBARDO, CAPE MAY COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE and others
Plaintiff:
MARK EL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
KELERCHIAN v. BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS AND EXPLOSIVES et al
as 2:2020cv00253
Defendant:
BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS AND EXPLOSIVES, WILLIAM BARR, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff:
VAHAN KELERCHIAN
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 92
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv21641
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Cooper v. Barr et al
as 3:2019cv02141
Plaintiff:
Charles Cooper
Defendant:
Regina Lombardo and William Barr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
QUIDETTO v. BARR et al
as 2:2019cv01618
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, BYRON TODD JONES and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL E. QUIDETTO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
