Other Statutes Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 230
Geiss v. The Weinstein Company Holdings
as 21-1007
Plaintiff: Melissa Thompson, Nannette Klatt, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Sara Ann Thomas, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, AKA Sarah Ann Masse and others
Defendant / Appellee: Nancy Ashbrooke, Richard Koenigsberg, Miramax Film NY, LLC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Larissa Gomes, Melissa Sagemiller, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Nannette May, FKA Nannette Klatt and others
Defendant: Miramax Film Corp. and Miramax, LLC
Cleophas White v. Bruce Lee, et al
as 21-15535
Defendant / Appellee: REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION OF SOUTHERN NEVADA, Bus Company, MJ Maynard, Ceo, JOEL MARTINEZ, Property Owner, CITY OF LAS VEGAS, Carolyn Goodman, Mayor and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: CLEOPHAS WHITE
Robert Zajac v. Maria Statton, et al
as 21-1686
Defendant / Appellee: Jennifer Y. Kendall Thomas, in their respective official capacity as members of the Minnesota Board of Medical Practice, Cheryl L. Bailey, in their respective official capacity as members of the Minnesota Board of Medical Practice, Maria K. Statton, in their respective official capacity as members of the Minnesota Board of Medical Practice and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Robert Zajac, MD
Damien Guedes, et al v. ATF, et al
as 21-5045
Plaintiff / Appellee: Firearms Policy Coalition, Inc., CA 18-3083
Defendant / Appellee: Regina Lombardo, in her official capacity as Acting Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, United States of America, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Florida Carry, Inc., Firearms Policy Foundation, Madison Society Foundation, Inc. and others
Gun Owners of America, Inc., et al v. DOJ, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-1131
Defendant / Appellee: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS AND EXPLOSIVES and REGINA LOMBARDO
Plaintiff / Appellant: DONALD J. ROBERTS, II and GUN OWNERS OF AMERICA, INC.
Roe v. Lombardo et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv00125
Defendant: Jeffrey Rosen and Regina Lombardo
Plaintiff: John Roe
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
City of Syracuse, NY v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Fi
as 21-191
Defendant / Appellee: Jeffrey A. Rosen, in his offficial capacity as Acting Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, United States Department of Justice, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: City of Syracuse, NY, City of San Jose, CA, City of Columbia, SC and others
Intervenor: Zachary Fort, Frederick Barton, Firearms Policy Coalition, Inc. and others
Rainier Arms LLC et al v. Bureau of Alcohol Tabacco Firearms and Explosives et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv00116
Plaintiff: Rainier Arms, LLC, William Green, Samuel Walley and others
Defendant: Jeffrey Rosen, Department of Justice, Acting Deputy Direct Regina Lombardo and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Everytown for Gun Safety Support Fund et al v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00376
Plaintiff: Everytown for Gun Safety Support Fund, The State of Illinois, THE CITY OF KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI and others
Defendant: Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and REGINA LOMBARDO
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Cargill v. Wilkinson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-51016
Plaintiff / Appellant: Michael Cargill
Defendant / Appellee: Regina Lombardo, in her official capacity as Acting Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, United States Department of Justice, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?