Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Burdex v. Oklahoma County Commissioners et al
as 5:2023cv00314
Plaintiff:
Elgret Lorenzo Burdex
Defendant:
Oklahoma County Commissioners, FNU Garner, Turn Key Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sumpter v. Dowling
as 5:2022cv00862
Petitioner:
Keith Sumpter and Keith Lorenzo Sumpter
Respondent:
Janet Dowling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sumpter v. Dowling
as 4:2022cv00343
Petitioner:
Keith Sumpter and Keith Lorenzo Sumpter
Respondent:
Janet Dowling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ricketts v. Logan et al
as 5:2022cv00482
Plaintiff:
Edward Lorenzo Ricketts
Defendant:
Mike Logan and FNU Dawson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ricketts v. Hobbs et al
as 5:2022cv00466
Plaintiff:
Edward Lorenzo Ricketts
Defendant:
William Hobbs, D/O Myrko and D/O Cowan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burdex v. Lowe et al
as 5:2022cv00233
Plaintiff:
Elgret Lorenzo Burdex
Defendant:
Gina Lowe, Tyler Lowe and Jim Gerlach
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration et al
as 5:2022cv00138
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Allen
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Clervrain et al v. Treat et al
as 6:2021cv00365
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain and Francis Cobbina Osei-Fosu
Defendant:
Geg Treat, Greg McCortney, James Leewright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burdex v. Prater et al
as 5:2021cv00632
Plaintiff:
Elgret L Burdex and Elgret Lorenzo Burdex
Defendant:
TD Taylor, David Prater and Jared Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ford v. Pettigrew
as 5:2021cv00090
Respondent:
FNU Pettigrew
Petitioner:
Lorenzo Ford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
