Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Daryise Earl v. Steve Kinziger, et al
as 23-3227
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARYISE L. EARL
Defendant / Appellee:
STEVE R. KINZIGER, ANGELO PANOS, KWON YANG and others
Matthew Soderlin v. Lori Doehling, et al
as 22-2045
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW SODERLIN
Defendant / Appellee:
LORI DOEHLING, ANGELA C. THOMPSON, PAULA BRADY and others
Dana McCalla v. Angela Thompson, et al
as 21-1975
Defendant / Appellee:
CINDY BARTER, SHARI KLENKE, JENNIFER DALY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANA E. MCCALLA
Sutton, Wayne v. Fuchs, Larry et al
as 3:2021cv00185
Plaintiff:
Wayne A. Sutton
Defendant:
Sue Novak, Angela Hodge, RN Isaac Hart and others
Not Classified By Court:
CCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sholar, Lamont v. Fuchs, Larry et al
as 3:2021cv00183
Defendant:
Doctor Justin Ribault, Ms. Melissa Block, Ms. Renee Schueler and others
Not Classified By Court:
CCI Prison Facility
Plaintiff:
Lamont D. Sholar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leiser v. Labby et al
as 2:2020cv00123
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Soda, K Thompson RN and others
Plaintiff:
Loren L Leiser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sutton, Wayne v. Dittman, Michael et al
as 3:2020cv00056
Defendant:
Michael Dittman, Neaver Walters, Renee Schueler and others
Not Classified By Court:
CCI Prison Facility
Plaintiff:
Wayne A. Sutton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gill v. West et al
as 2:2019cv01400
Defendant:
Officer Heinon, Lt McClain, Jennifer McDermott and others
Plaintiff:
Charles B Gill, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carothers v. Wheatley et al
as 2:2019cv00682
Plaintiff:
Robert A Carothers
Defendant:
Danielle Foster, Dr C Wheatley, Dr Prehn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCalla v. Thompson et al
as 2:2018cv01895
Defendant:
Wisconsin Department of Corrections, Angela Thompson, Jane/John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Dana E McCalla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
