Cases 1 - 10 of 12
FLORES v. PEREZ et al
as 1:2023cv00673
Plaintiff:
LOUIS FLORES
Defendant:
FELIX PEREZ, JACKSON PIERRON, JORGE PASTORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Edwin Gvalevech, et al v. Kroger Specialty Pharmacy, Inc., et al
as 23-55471
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, EX REL. STATE OF CALIFOR EDWIN GVALEVECH
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex. rel. and STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ex. rel.
Defendant / Appellee:
KROGER SPECIALTY PHARMACY, INC., KROGER SPECIALTY PHARMACY CA 2, LLC, ERL MEDICAL CORPORATION and others
Dade v. Almanza et al
as 3:2020cv03739
Plaintiff:
Jacquez Dade
Defendant:
Administration, Brian Topper, Timothy Wick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weaver et al v. The New York City Housing Authority et al
as 1:2019cv10760
Plaintiff:
George Weaver, Fight For NYCHA, Vera Naseva and others
Defendant:
The City of New York, Bill De Blasio, The New York City Housing Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 vc
Flores v. United States Department of Ju
as 17-3621
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Louis Flores
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of Justice
Flores v. United States Department of Ju
as 17-428
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Louis Flores
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of Justice
Flores v. United States Department of Justice
as 1:2017cv00036
Plaintiff:
Louis Flores
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Flores v. United States Department of Justice
as 1:2015cv02627
Plaintiff:
Louis Flores
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Louis Flores v. M. McDonald
as 12-55747
Petitioner - Appellant:
LOUIS FLORES
Respondent - Appellee:
M. MCDONALD
Louis Flores v. M. McDonald
as 11-57129
Petitioner - Appellant:
LOUIS FLORES
Respondent - Appellee:
M. MCDONALD, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
