Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Roberts v. Studio 15
as 3:2024cv01329
Plaintiff:
Tina Louise Roberts
Defendant:
San Diego Police Officer 8332 and Studio 15
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 sh Fed. Question: Sexual Harassment
Roberts v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2023cv00469
Plaintiff:
Barbara Louise Roberts
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Tina Roberts v. Studio 15 Management, et al
as 23-55523
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TINA LOUISE ROBERTS
Defendant / Appellee:
STUDIO 15 MANAGEMENT, RUTH RIVERIA, JOLINA QULITA and others
Tina Roberts v. Raul Sanchez, et al
as 23-55323
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TINA LOUISE ROBERTS
Defendant / Appellee:
RAUL SANCHEZ, Risk Management Public Libility 1200 Third Ave Suit 100 MS 518S, BRENDA HILL, Risk Management Public Libility 1200 Third Ave Suit 100 MS 518S, MAGANA, Badge Number 1036; NPD and Dispatcher and others
Hammond v. Roberts
as 3:2023cv05300
Plaintiff:
Darius T Hammond
Defendant:
Stephanie Louise Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Goldstein v. Wratschko et al
as 2:2023cv02045
Plaintiff:
Munro Goldstein
Defendant:
Arnold Wratschko, WASM, LLC., Patricia Louise Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Roberts v. Studio 15 Management
as 23-1453
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TINA LOUISE ROBERTS
Defendant / Appellee:
STUDIO 15 MANAGEMENT, RUTH RIVERIA and JOVANNA Q.
Tina Roberts v. Cari Olson, et al
as 23-55066
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TINA LOUISE ROBERTS
Defendant / Appellee:
CARI OLSON, NML1917532, US Bank, MATT MILLES, Bank Manager and U.S. BANK
Roberts v. Olson
as 23-1411
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TINA LOUISE ROBERTS
Defendant / Appellee:
CARI OLSON, MATT MILLES and U.S. BANK
(PS) Roberts v. Bowman et al
as 2:2022cv01694
Plaintiff:
Tina Louise Roberts
Defendant:
Brian Bowman, Cara Bergamamo, Andrew T. Williamson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
