Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Beall v. The State of Louisiana et al
as 8:2023cv00057
Plaintiff:
Justin Beall
Defendant:
The State of Louisiana, The State of Mississppi, The State of Nebraska and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC v. State of Nebraska et al
as 4:2018cv03109
Defendant:
State of Nebraska, Scott Frakes and Nebraska Department of Correctional Services
Plaintiff:
Fresenius Kabi USA, LLC
Interested Party:
State of Indiana, Cline Williams Wright Johnson & Oldfather, L.L.P., State of Louisiana and others
Intervenor:
Sandoz, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
McGill et al v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Alabama
as 8:2016cv00147
Defendant:
Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield of Missouri, Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield of Nevada, Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield of Wisconsin and others
Plaintiff:
Brian McGill, Rochelle McGill and Sadler Electric, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Rosen v. Transaction Systems Architects et al
as 8:2002cv00561
Defendant:
Gregory Derkacht, Greg Duman, William E. Fischer and others
Mediator:
Roger Dietz and Layn R. Phillips
Plaintiff:
Genesee County Employees' Retirement System, Nancy Rosen and Roger M. Wally
Intervenor Plaintiff:
State of Louisiana District Attorney's Retirement System
Movant:
State of Louisiana District Attorney's Retirement System
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Desert Orchid Partners v. Transaction Systems Architects et al
as 8:2002cv00553
Mediator:
Roger Deitz and Layn R. Phillips
Plaintiff:
Desert Orchid Partners, Genesee County Employees' Retirement System and Roger M. Wally
Defendant:
Gregory J. Duman, William E. Fischer, Edward Fuxa and others
Interested Party:
Miller Thomson, Alan Young and Karen Young
Intervenor Plaintiff:
State of Louisiana District Attorney's Retirement System
Movant:
State of Louisiana District Attorney's Retirement System
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
