Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 4,831
Zierhut v. Louisiana Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00008
Plaintiff: Bruce Zierhut
Defendant: Louisiana Department of Corrections, Louisiana State Prison Hospital, Unknown LeBlanc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oby v. Green
as 24-60083
Plaintiff: Sherman Oby
Defendant: Justin Green, Roderick Logan, Darrel Vannoy, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary and others
Callais et al v. Landry We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00122
Plaintiff: Phillip Callais, Lloyd Price, Bruce Odell and others
Defendant: Nancy Landry
Intervenor: National Association for the Advancement of Colored People Louisiana State Conference, Press Robinson, Edgar Cage and others
Petitioner: Edward Galmon, Sr, Ciara Hart, Norris Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Reynolds v. Robinson
as 23-30923
Petitioner: Jeffrey Michael Reynolds
Respondent: Alvin Robinson, Warden, Nelson Coleman Correctional Center and Louisiana State
Jefferson Parish v. Chevron
as 24-30031
Plaintiff: Jefferson Parish and Louisiana State, ex rel, Parish of Jefferson
Intervenor: Louisiana State, through the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources, Office of Coastal Management, Thomas F. Harris, Secretary and Louisiana State, ex rel, Jeff Landry, Attorney General
Defendant: Chevron U.S.A. Holdings, Incorporated, as successor in interest to Texaco E&P Inc. and Texaco Inc., Chevron USA, Incorporated, as successor in interest to The California Company, Atlantic Richfield Company, in its own capacity and as successor in interest to Acro Oil and Gas Company-Division of Atlantic Richfield and others
Plaquemines Parish v. Chevron
as 24-30032
Plaintiff: Plaquemines Parish and Louisiana State, ex rel, Parish of Plaquemines
Intervenor: Louisiana Department of Natural Resources, Office of Coastal Management and its Secretary, Thomas F. Harris and Louisiana State, ex rel, Jeff Landry, Attorney General
Defendant: Chevron USA, Incorporated, in its own capacity and as successor in interest to Chevron Oil Company and the California Company, Chevron USA Holdings, Incorporated, as successor in interest to Texaco E & P, Incorporated and Texaco, Incorporated, Texas Company and others
Jefferson Parish v. Chevron
as 24-30023
Plaintiff: Jefferson Parish
Intervenor: Louisiana State, ex rel, Jeff Landry, Attorney General and Louisiana State, through the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources, Office of Coastal Management, Thomas F. Harris, Secretary
Defendant: Chevron USA, Incorporated
Jefferson Parish v. Chevron
as 24-30022
Plaintiff: Jefferson Parish
Intervenor: Louisiana State, ex rel, Jeff Landry, Attorney General and Louisiana State, through the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources, Office of Coastal Management, Thomas F. Harris, Secretary
Defendant: Chevron USA, Incorporated and Chevron USA Holdings, Incorporated, As successor in interest to Texaco, Incorporated
Plaquemines Parish v. Chevron
as 24-30028
Plaintiff: Plaquemines Parish
Intervenor: Louisiana State, ex rel. Jeff Landry, Attorney General and Louisiana State, through the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources, Office of Coastal Management, Thomas F. Harris, Secretary
Defendant: Chevron USA, Incorporated and Chevron USA, Incorporated, as successor in interest to Gulf Oil Corporation and the California Company
Plaquemines Parish v. Chevron
as 24-30029
Plaintiff: Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana Department of Natural Resources and Louisiana State, ex rel, Parish of Plaquemines
Intervenor: Louisiana State, ex rel, Jeff Landry, Attorney General
Defendant: Chevron USA, Incorporated, Named as Successor in Interest to Chevron Oil Company, The California Company and Gulf and Oil Corp. and Chevron Pipeline Company, Named as Successor in Interest to Gulf Refining Company

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?