Cases 1 - 10 of 79
Love Cathedral Community Church v. Chesterfield County
as 3:2023cv00738
Plaintiff:
Love Cathedral Community Church
Defendant:
Chesterfield County, Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Declaratory Judgment
Love v. Edmonds
as 3:2023cv00635
Petitioner:
Shaun Love
Respondent:
Larry Edmunds and Larry Edmonds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bang Laugh Love LLC v. Viragh et al
as 7:2023cv00633
Defendant:
Brea Viragh, Monique McDonell and Pippa Green
Plaintiff:
Bang Laugh Love LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Singh v. Singh, et al.
as 3:2023cv00339
Plaintiff:
Bhupinder Singh
Defendant:
Harmanpreet Singh, Kaur Kulbir, Armaan VA Corp. d/b/a Lovely Market and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00506
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00731
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question-Violation of Constitutional Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00320
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00024
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sexual Harassment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Hare Krishna, Inc., a Virginia Corp. d/b/a Love Food Mart 7 et al v. United States of America
as 4:2021cv00106
Plaintiff:
Hare Krishna, Inc., a Virginia Corp. d/b/a Love Food Mart 7, Japan Joshi and Govindkumar Patel
Defendant:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
