Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Oates El v. United States Treasury Department, The et al
as 0:2022cv02907
Plaintiff:
Lovell Nahmour Oates El
Defendant:
United States Treasury Department, The, State of Minnesota, State of Illinois and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Oates v. Benton County Jail et al
as 0:2022cv01714
Plaintiff:
Lovell Nahmour Oates
Defendant:
Benton County Jail, Minnesota Department of Corrections and United States Department of Treasury
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simmons v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2022cv00269
Plaintiff:
Lovell Simmons
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Loving El et al v. Minnesota Dept. of Corr. et al
as 0:2019cv00707
Defendant:
Dornbach, J. Doeden, Kathryn Halvorson and others
Plaintiff:
Lovell N. Oates El and Ronelle R. Loving El
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oates v. Minnesota Department of Corrections et al
as 0:2017cv05166
Petitioner:
Lovell N. Oates
Respondent:
Minnesota Department of Corrections and Tom Roy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Chilcote et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2017cv04531
Plaintiff:
Stephen Chilcote and Lovell Chilcote
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lovell v. Mentor Corporation et al
as 0:2013cv02002
Plaintiff:
Sharon K. Lovell
Defendant:
Mentor Corporation and Mentor Worldwide LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Anderson v. King
as 0:2011cv00948
Petitioner:
Maurice Lovell Anderson
Defendant:
John King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lovell v. Davol, Inc. et alDO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED OUT.
as 0:2010cv00600
Plaintiff:
Clinton Dean Lovell and Clinton Dean Lovell
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Lovell v. Medtronic, Inc.
as 0:2008cv00726
Plaintiff:
Diane Lovell and Diane Lovell
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
