Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Gibson et al v. City of Portland et al
as 3:2023cv00833
Plaintiff:
Joseph Gibson and Russell Schultz
Defendant:
City of Portland, Multnomah County, Multnomah County District Attorney's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Willis v. Lovell et al
as 3:2022cv00228
Plaintiff:
Steven Dawayne Willis
Defendant:
Chief Chuck Lovell, Sheriff Mike Reese, State of Oregon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willis v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2022cv00125
Plaintiff:
Steven Dawayne Willis
Defendant:
State of Oregon, County of Multnomah, City of Portland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willis v. Elam et al
as 3:2022cv00123
Plaintiff:
Steven Dawayne Willis
Defendant:
Charles C. Elam, Elizabeth A. Willard, Portland Police Bureau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01882
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01218
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Elia et al v. Wheeler et al
as 3:2020cv01106
Plaintiff:
Cory Elia and Lesley McLam
Defendant:
Michelle Petty, State of Oregon, Mayor Ted Wheeler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lovell v. Columbia County Jail et al
as 3:2020cv00804
Defendant:
Columbia County Medical Department and Staff and Columbia County Jail
Plaintiff:
Don D. Lovell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lovell v. USA
as 3:2019cv00365
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Don Douglas Lovell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Lovell v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 3:2019cv00030
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Michael Dale Lovell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
