Cases 1 - 10 of 219
Myers et al v. St Joseph County Jail et al
as 3:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
Michael Myers, Michael R Myers, Jr, Caleb Raber and others
Defendant:
St Joseph County Jail and Lowe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Straub v. St Joseph County Jail et al
as 3:2024cv00133
Plaintiff:
Todd Straub
Defendant:
St Joseph County Jail and Lowe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Raber v. St Joseph County Jail et al
as 3:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
Caleb Raber
Defendant:
St Joseph County Jail and Lowe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOWE v. TOYOTA MOTOR MANUFACTURING INDIANA, INC.
as 3:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
DAVID LOWE
Defendant:
TOYOTA MOTOR MANUFACTURING INDIANA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
STANTON v. LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, LLC
as 1:2024cv00169
Plaintiff:
JOHNATHAN STANTON
Defendant:
LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
LOWE v. SOUNDVIEW MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
BRIAN LOWE
Defendant:
SOUNDVIEW MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLLC, STONECREST APARTMENTS, LP and SOUNDVIEW MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
NICHOL v. LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, LLC
as 1:2023cv02166
Plaintiff:
GAIL M. NICHOL
Defendant:
LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
RICHARDSON v. FREEMAN et al
as 4:2023cv00188
Plaintiff:
ISRAEL DODD RICHARDSON
Defendant:
KENNY FREEMAN, CODY LOW and KYLE LEE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HAULK v. LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, LLC
as 1:2023cv01932
Plaintiff:
BRENDA HAULK
Defendant:
LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
LOWE v. DOLGENCORP LLC.
as 4:2023cv00157
Plaintiff:
MORGAN LOWE
Defendant:
DOLGENCORP LLC. and DOLGENCORP LLC. d/b/a DOLLAR GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
