Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Loyde v. Odom et al
as 2:2024cv02202
Plaintiff:
Ed Henry Loyde
Defendant:
Sheriff Odom, John Doe - Officer, Jane Doe - Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jonathon Edick v. Michael Burgess
as 24-1109
Petitioner:
JONATHON EDICK and JONATHON LOYD EDICK
Respondent:
MICHAEL BURGESS, Warden, identified on initiating document as People of the State of Michigan
Brown v. Hudgins et al
as 3:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Brown
Defendant:
Caleb Hudgins, Steven White, William Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foster v. Bonner et al
as 2:2023cv02356
Plaintiff:
Loyd Wayne Foster
Defendant:
Floyd Bonner, Jr. and Shelby County Sheriffs Jail Division
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Loyde v. Genovese
as 2:2022cv02049
Petitioner:
Ed Loyde
Respondent:
Kevin Genovese
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Loyd v. Spurlock et al
as 6:2021cv00081
Defendant:
Michelle Spurlock and Edith Hacker
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Loyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Loyd v. Hacker et al
as 6:2021cv00053
Defendant:
Michelle Spurlock and Edith Hacker
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Loyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chapman v. O'Dell
as 5:2020cv00165
Plaintiff:
Marcus Chapman and Marcus Fitzgang Chapman
Defendant:
Sgt. O'Dell, Sgt. Butler Cortez, Deputy Warden Syler Grief and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Loyde v. Corizon Health, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00710
Defendant:
Molly O'Toole, Elliot Garrett, Christopher Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Mack Mandrell Loyde
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Loyd v. Daviess County Detention Center et al
as 4:2020cv00110
Defendant:
Major Jack Jones, James Emmick, Daviess County Detention Center and others
Plaintiff:
Christian J. Loyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
