Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Loyd v. Penzone
as 2:2023cv01506
Petitioner:
Jeremiah Loyd
Respondent:
Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Loyd v. Penzone et al
as 2:2023cv01013
Petitioner:
Jeremiah Loyd
Respondent:
Paul Penzone and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02065
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Reese v. Maricopa County Sheriff Office, et al
as 2:2021cv01723
Plaintiff:
Jordan Anthony Loyd Reese
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff Office, Correctional Health Services, Maricopa County Transport Team and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reese #245100 v. Baja et al
as 2:2020cv02006
Defendant:
Unknown Parties, Unknown Baja, Unknown Siedemie and others
Plaintiff:
Jordan Anthony Loyd Reese
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ross v. Von Blanckensee
as 4:2020cv00018
Petitioner:
Jason Loyd Ross
Respondent:
Barbara Von Blanckensee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hackman #136624 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2017cv01840
Plaintiff:
Daniel Weldon Hackman
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Richard Pratt, Subodh Shroff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reese v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2017cv01093
Plaintiff:
Jordan Anthony Loyd Reese
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Unknown Parties, Unknown Party and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tedder et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv00711
Plaintiff:
Loyd Lamar Tedder, Jr. and Linda Dianne Hunt Tedder
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Desert Autosports LLC v. Loyd
as 2:2016cv01267
Plaintiff:
Desert Autosports LLC
Defendant:
Casey Loyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
