Cases 1 - 10 of 382
Willis v. Ruff et al
as 5:2024ct03102
Plaintiff:
Andrew Reginald Willis
Defendant:
Mark C. Ruff, City Of Fayetteville, Sgt. James Yowell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Pate et al
as 5:2024ct03099
Plaintiff:
Daniel Isaiah Thomas
Defendant:
Lt. Pate, Robeson County, Burnis Wilkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Acuna v. Jastal et al
as 5:2024ct03097
Plaintiff:
Raymondo Acuna
Defendant:
Lt. M. Jastal and Officer Finley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hawkins v. Bynum
as 5:2024ct03096
Plaintiff:
Telyzuan Ja'Keith Hawkins
Defendant:
Lt. Bynum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ali v. Sledge et al
as 5:2024ct03080
Plaintiff:
Abdulkadir Sharif Ali
Defendant:
Wendy Sledge, Kenneth Washington, William Riddick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Womble v. Smith et al
as 5:2024ct03078
Plaintiff:
Edward Lamont Womble
Defendant:
Domenick Smith, Lt. Renita Summers, John R. Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILLER v. O.I.C. et al
as 1:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
JOHN FRANK MILLER
Defendant:
LT. O.I.C., OFFICER SLONG, JANE DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Howard et al
as 5:2024ct03063
Plaintiff:
Darius Tremayne Brooks
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Howard, Sgt. Johnson, Sgt. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Carter et al
as 5:2024ct03061
Plaintiff:
Russell Young
Defendant:
Nurse Carter, Nurse Smith, Lt. John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd v. McMahon et al
as 5:2024ct03053
Plaintiff:
Harold Boyd, Jr
Defendant:
Edward J. McMahon, Major Price, Batman Whitmore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
