Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Talley v. Harry et al
as 1:2023cv01033
Plaintiff:
Quintez Talley
Defendant:
Dr. Laurel Harry, MHM, Inc., Pennsylvania Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LAFFEY v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2022cv00296
Plaintiff:
FRANCIS LAFFEY
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, MARK CAPOZZA, CO I EMMINGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
TALLEY v. PA. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2019cv00308
Defendant:
LT. COLLINS, DORINA VARNER, GOVENOR TOM WOLFE and others
Plaintiff:
QUINTEZ TALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
TALLEY v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2018cv01687
Defendant:
LT. COLLINS, JARED ANKROM, LISA DUNCAN and others
Plaintiff:
QUINTEZ TALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
TALLEY et al v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2018cv01339
Defendant:
LT. COLLINS, OFFICE OF POPULATION MANAGEMENT, SCOTT A KNICKELSON and others
Plaintiff:
MARCUS WALKER, QUINTEZ TALLEY, GARLAND BAYLOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
RUTH v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2018cv04010
Defendant:
LT. COLLINS, WARDEN JULIO M. ALGARIN, ASST. WARDEN SEAN P. MCGEE and others
Plaintiff:
RYAN DAVID RUTH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PAGE-JONES v. CAPOZZI et al
as 2:2018cv00635
Plaintiff:
AKEEM PAGE-JONES
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT LANEL CAPOZZI, DEPUTY NICKELSON, LT. ALBRIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARKS v. PA. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2017cv01136
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MARKS
Defendant:
PA. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, LT. NEWMAN, LT. COLLINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BENNETT v. COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY et al
as 2:2010cv04357
Plaintiff:
JAMAL EUGENE BENNETT
Defendant:
COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY, CITY COMMISSIONERS (MONT. COUNTY), NANCY T. MCFARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
