Cases 1 - 10 of 10
CONWAY v. IRWIN et al
as 1:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER CONWAY
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT RANDY IRWIN, CO- MOWREY, CO MOWREY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
STOCKTON v. IRWIN et al
as 1:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
RONALD STOCKTON
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT R. IRWIN, CAPTAIN J. KURDICK, CAPTAIN WEILAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
STOCKTON v. HARRY et al
as 1:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
RONALD STOCKTON
Defendant:
LAUREL HARRY, SUPERINTENDENT R. IRWIN, R. MARSH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
STOCKTON v. HARRY et al
as 1:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
RONALD STOCKTON
Defendant:
LAUREL HARRY, G. LETTLE, G. LITTLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
CARDWELL v. HOLLIBAUGH et al
as 2:2023cv02156
Plaintiff:
JAMAR CARDWELL
Defendant:
KEN HOLLIBAUGH, DEPUTY TAYLOR, DAN CARO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MOSLEY v. IRWIN et al.
as 1:2023cv00133
Plaintiff:
KAREEM MOSLEY
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT R. IRWIN, DEPUTY E. MONGELLUZO, DEPUTY M. BLICHA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SAMUELS v. OVERMYER et al
as 1:2021cv00324
Plaintiff:
LARRY RAFIQ SAMUELS
Defendant:
(FRM) SUPERINTENDENT M. OVERMYER, SUPERINTENDENT DEREK OBERLANDER, LT. WALKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Baez-Garcia v. United States of America et al
as 3:2021cv01355
Plaintiff:
David Baez-Garcia
Defendant:
United States of America, R. Kresock, Capt. Hunter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VICTOR v. OVERMYER et al
as 1:2018cv00366
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM VICTOR
Defendant:
COUNSELOR HOPKINS, LT. WALKER, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
RIECO v. CAPOZZA et al
as 2:2014cv01145
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE L. RIECO
Defendant:
MARK CAPOZZA, SHANE DADY, TIM BAER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
