Cases 1 - 10 of 19
MELENDEZ v. LL FLOORING, INC. et al
as 3:2022cv04507
Defendant:
LL FLOORING, INC., LUMBER LIQUIDATORS INC, LL FLOORING DESIGNS and others
Plaintiff:
EDDY MELENDEZ
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
MELENDEZ v. LL FLOORING, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv04507
Defendant:
LL FLOORING, INC., LUMBER LIQUIDATORS INC, LL FLOORING DESIGNS and others
Plaintiff:
EDDY MELENDEZ
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
MELENDEZ v. LL FLOORING, INC.
as 2:2022cv04506
Defendant:
LL FLOORING, INC., LUMBER LIQUIDATORS INC and LL FLOORING DESIGNS
Plaintiff:
EDDY MELENDEZ
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv02125
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00631
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Christopher Manzo v. Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
as 2:2016cv05112
Plaintiff:
Christopher Manzo
Defendant:
LUMBER LIQUIDATORS, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCPHERSON v. LUMBER LIQUIDATORS, INC.
as 2:2016cv01263
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW MCPHERSON
Defendant:
LUMBER LIQUIDATORS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HESNEY et al v. LUMBER LIQUIDATORS, INC.
as 2:2016cv04716
Plaintiff:
SOLOMON HESNEY and LYNNE HESNEY
Defendant:
LUMBER LIQUIDATORS, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KUMNIK et al v. LUMBER LIQUIDATORS, INC.
as 2:2015cv01580
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER KUMNIK and LISA KUMNIK
Defendant:
LUMBER LIQUIDATORS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BYCHKOWSKI et al v. LUMBER LIQUIDATORS, INC et al
as 1:2015cv03305
Plaintiff:
DEMETRI BYCHKOWSKI and SHERRY BYCHKOWSKI
Defendant:
LUMBER LIQUIDATORS, INC , LUMBER LIQUIDATORS LEASING, LLC , LUMBER LIQUIDATORS HOLDINGS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
