Cases 11 - 20 of 36
Kennedy v. Mobile, Alabama District Attorney's Office et al
as 1:2014cv00195
Petitioner:
Richard Daron Kennedy
Respondent:
Mobile, Alabama District Attorney's Office, Robin D. Scales, Leeposey Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cooley v. Price et al
as 1:2014cv00135
Petitioner:
Charles Edward Cooley, Jr.
Respondent:
Cheryl Price and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cooley v. Price et al
as 1:2014cv00100
Petitioner:
Charles Edward Cooley, Jr.
Respondent:
Cheryl Price and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gill v. Barrett et al
as 2:2013cv00514
Petitioner:
Vanessa Gill
Respondent:
Bobby Barrett, Kim Tobias Thomas and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Muhammad v. Bethel et al
as 2:2013cv00030
Plaintiff:
Kalim A.R. Muhammad
Defendant:
Brenda L. Bethel Muhammad, Wanda Goodwin, Alabama DHR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pettaway v. Jones et al
as 1:2012cv00722
Petitioner:
Jesse Pettaway, Jr.
Respondent:
Kenneth Jones and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pittman v. Strange et al
as 1:2012cv00667
Plaintiff:
William Henry Pittman
Defendant:
Luther Strange and Hugh McCall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Anderson et al v. Youngpeter et al
as 1:2012cv00645
Plaintiff:
Michael Dewayne Anderson and Reginald DeWayne Jones
Defendant:
Michael A. Youngpeter, Charlie Graddick, P.J. Welch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lavinskey v. Hetzel et al
as 1:2012cv00559
Petitioner:
Clifton A. Lavinskey
Respondent:
Gary Hetzel and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Giles et al
as 1:2012cv00457
Petitioner:
Reginald Williams
Respondent:
J. C. Giles and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
