Cases 1 - 9 of 9
LUXOTTICA GROUP S.p.A. et al v. GALLAGHERS OLDE FASHION SERVICES, INC. et al
as 3:2022cv30054
Plaintiff:
LUXOTTICA GROUP S.p.A. and Oakley, Inc.
Defendant:
GALLAGHERS OLDE FASHION SERVICES, INC., Robert Galica, Nisa Mian, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
LUXOTTICA GROUP S.p.A. v. BASIC PLUS, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv30053
Plaintiff:
LUXOTTICA GROUP S.p.A.
Defendant:
BASIC PLUS, LLC, Nadeem Saeed and Ahmad Amin
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
LUXOTTICA GROUP S.p.A. v. LEE
as 4:2021cv10934
Defendant:
Young Kil Lee
Plaintiff:
Luxottica Group S.p.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Luxottica Group S.p.A. v. Prime Way, LLC, st al.
as 1:2021cv00079
Defendant:
PRIME WAY, LLC, EZ Mart Foods of RI and Khalil Jamal
Plaintiff:
LUXOTTICA GROUP S.p.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Luxottica Group S.p.A. v. Tibet Boutique LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00845
Defendant:
Urgen Tsomo, Life at the Beach, LLC, Ocean Breeze Gifts Etc LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Luxottica Group S.p.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Luxottica Group S.p.A. et al v. Diop et al
as 1:2019cv11048
Defendant:
Yarama's Boutique LLC and Mariama Diop
Plaintiff:
Oakley, Inc. and Luxottica Group S.p.A
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
LUXOTTICA GROUP S.p.A. v. SUPER DISCOUNTS, INC. et al
as 1:2018cv12375
Defendant:
Zhou Ming Zeng and SUPER DISCOUNTS, INC.
Plaintiff:
LUXOTTICA GROUP S.p.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
LUXOTTICA GROUP S.p.A. et al v. SHUN HAO GIFT SHOP LLC et al
as 1:2018cv12374
Defendant:
SHUN HAO GIFT SHOP LLC and SHUN LU ZHANG
Plaintiff:
LUXOTTICA GROUP S.p.A. and OAKLEY, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Luxottica Group, S.P.A., v. Caribbean Retailers, Inc.
as 3:2015cv01518
Plaintiff:
Luxottica Group S.P.A.
Defendant:
Caribbean Retailers, Inc. and Manolo Chaves-Torres
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
