Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Keene, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco, et al.
as 24-1574
Plaintiff:
SELINA KEENE, MARK MCCLURE, MELODY FOUNTILA and others
Defendant:
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, LONDON BREED, CAROL ISEN and others
Kelly v. Hilltop Inn Motel Inc. et al
as 0:2023cv03087
Plaintiff:
Stephen P. Kelly
Defendant:
Hilltop Inn Motel Inc., Gordon H. Eibensteiner, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Stanny Ray Hudgins et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as SC/2:23-CV-01747
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC FIRE & SECURITY AMERICAS CORPORATION, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
Stanny Ray Hudgins, Philip Wendell Gould, Frank Joseph Micalizzi and others
Johnson v. Automotive Service Center, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00359
Plaintiff:
Cindy Lynn Johnson
Defendant:
Automotive Service Center, LLC and Palmer Administrative Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
United States v. Venito Johnson
as 22-3135
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Venito Lynn Johnson
Clarke v. Roberts et al
as 1:2022cv00074
Plaintiff:
William Carol Clarke
Defendant:
Julia Roberts, Jake Tapper, Steven Bo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
State of Texas vs Johnson Jr.
as 6:2022cv00633
Plaintiff:
STATE OF TEXAS
Defendant:
Arthur Lynn Johnson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
Johnson v. Goodwin
as 21-30592
Petitioner / Appellant:
Melvin Lynn Johnson, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
Jerry Goodwin, Warden, David Wade Correctional Center
City of Taylor, TN, et al v. Astec Industries, Inc., et al
as 21-5602
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID C. SILVIOUS, ASTEC INDUSTRIES, INC., BENJAMIN G. BROCK and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LYNN JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
CITY OF TAYLOR, TN, GENERAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
