Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Aaron et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00800
Plaintiff:
Aaron, Barbara Bienvenue, Andy Aaron and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00465
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
USA v. Barry Bailey
as 19-10763
Defendant / Appellant:
BARRY LYNN BAILEY
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In re: Jamie Bailey
as 19-5363
Respondent:
GEORGIA CROWELL, Warden
Petitioner:
In re: JAMIE LYNN BAILEY
Bailey v. Twomey, et al
as 19-8004
Defendant / Appellee:
JEREMY WALKER, ROBERT SANFORD and DANIEL TWOMEY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBIN LYNN BAILEY
Sun et al v. State of New York Office of the Attorney General et al
as 1:2017cv05916
Defendant:
109 Precinct and 2 Female Enforcement Police Officers from 109 Precinct, Alfonse D'Amato Federal Courthouse, Attorney Generals Office of Eric T. Schneiderman and others
Pharisee:
Akwei Oko Acquaye, Aprilanne Agostino, Thomas P. Aliotta and others
Wang Xing Ren:
Aron M. Bloom, Daniele Dezago, Sean P. Greene and others
Wand Xing Ren:
Robert L. Capers
Plaintiff:
Xiu Jian Sun
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sun v. Katzmann
as 16-3103
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Xiu Jian Sun, the spiritual Adam
Defendant - Appellee:
Ernest J. Cavallo, Akwei Oko Acquaye, Timothy J. Dufficy and others
Sun et al v. Katzmann et al
as 1:2016cv03937
Defendant:
Akwei Oko Acquaye, Aprilanne Agostino, Thomas P. Aliotta and others
Plaintiff:
Xiu Jian Sun
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
US v. David Bailey
as 10-4952
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID LYNN BAILEY
Adams, et al v. USA
as 4:2003cv00049
Plaintiff:
Timm Adams , Barbara Adams , Arrow Head Potato Co and others
Defendant:
USA
Intervenor:
E.I. Du Pont de Nemours and Company, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
