Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Cosgrove v. Miller et al
as 2:2016cv10164
Plaintiff:
Cary Cosgrove
Defendant:
Miller, M Anderson, Patsy Enos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cosgrove #758688 v. Miller et al
as 2:2015cv00189
Plaintiff:
Cary Cosgrove #758688
Defendant:
Unknown Miller, M. Anderson, Patsy Enos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young et al v. International Union United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, Local 651 et al
as 2:2015cv11151
Plaintiff:
Earline Young , DeAndre Adams , Shirley A Adams and others
Defendant:
International Union United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, Local 651, International Union United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America and General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 160
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv10154
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Moorer et al v. Booker et al
as 2:2009cv13725
Plaintiff:
John Moorer, Clarissa Martin, Makia Wilson and others
Defendant:
Raymond D Booker, T Beard, Tina Pope and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Type:
Other Statutes
Anderson v. Monumental Life Insurance Company
as 2:2009cv10861
Plaintiff:
Paula M. Anderson
Defendant:
Monumental Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Prudential Insurance Company of America v. Anderson et al
as 5:2008cv11936
Plaintiff:
Prudential Insurance Company of America
Defendant:
Charles D Anderson, Clint M Anderson, Charles R. Anderson, Jr., Revocable Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
Jefferson Pilot Financial Insurance Company v. Anderson et al
as 1:2007cv12059
Plaintiff:
Jefferson Pilot Financial Insurance Company
Defendant:
Emma S Anderson and Shannon M Anderson
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
