Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Bonilla v. Meza et al
as 3:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Amalia L Meza, Charles G Rogers, Esteban Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01892
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Newsome v. Gill et al
as 3:2018cv01938
Defendant:
Cynthia Aaron, Judith Haller, Judge Judith McConnell and others
Plaintiff:
Mario A. Newsome
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Ramona Gibson et al v. Sanofi U.S. Services Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv01068
Defendant:
Accord Healthcare, Inc., Hospira Worldwide, LLC, Hospira, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Dupree, Jennifer W. Edwards, Georgette Enwright and others
Joseph Grimes v. Munoz et al
as 5:2017cv02314
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections, California Institution for Men, M. Gill and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Grimes
Paul Roberts v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 5:2016cv01929
Defendant:
D. Borders, D. Borders, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Roberts
Gill v. MacDonald
as 3:2016cv01177
Petitioner:
Steven M. Gill
Respondent:
MacDonald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cooper v. State of California et al
as 3:2015cv05800
Plaintiff:
Victor Wayne Cooper
Defendant:
State of California, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) , Jeffrey A. Beard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ira Don Parthemore v. T Perez et al
as 5:2015cv00276
Respondent:
California Institute for Men, M Gill and T Perez
Petitioner:
Ira D. Parthemore
Delynn M. Gill v. LaSalle Bank National Association et al
as 2:2014cv07526
Defendant:
ALAW Corporation, Bank of America NA, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Delynn M. Gill
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
