Cases 21 - 30 of 48
Donna Hill v. James Barnacle, et al
as 13-1205
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONNA M. HILL
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES BARNACLE, STEVEN GLUNT, DAVID CLOSE and others
Donna Hill v. Pennsylvania Department of Cor, et al
as 13-1066
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONNA M. HILL, on behalf of Dwayne Hill
Defendant - Appellee:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SUPERINTENDENT STEVEN GLUNT and others
HILL v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2012cv01697
Plaintiff:
DONNA M. HILL
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN WETZEL, STEVEN GLUNT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HILL v. BARNACLE et al
as 2:2012cv01145
Plaintiff:
DONNA M. HILL
Defendant:
JAMES BARNACLE, STEVEN GLUNT, DAVID CLOSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HILL v. ALCOA STEAMSHIP COMPANY, INC.
as 2:2011cv52263
Plaintiff:
CHARLES M HILL
Defendant:
ALCOA STEAMSHIP COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
HILL v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv48499
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND M. HILL
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
HILL v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv52264
Plaintiff:
CHARLES M HILL
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
HILL et al v. ABEX CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv64580
Plaintiff:
ALBERT M HILL and NANCY HILL
Defendant:
ABEX CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KALLENBERG et al v. OWENS ILLINOIS, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv83707
Plaintiff:
JOHN A. KALLENBERG, SR. , KATHERINE KALLENBERG and JACQUELINE M. HILL
Defendant:
OWENS ILLINOIS, INC., PITTSBURGH CORNING CORP., EAGLE PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HILL v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv55278
Plaintiff:
ELLA M. HILL
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
