Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Robert Hughes v. Kevin Bovencamp, et al
as 20-35449
Defendant / Appellee:
KEN E. MOORE, KEVIN BOVENCAMP, Assistant Secretary/Deputy Director Washington State Dept of Corrections, SMITH, Dr./M.D. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT WAYNE HUGHES
Gail Vincent v. Belinda Stewart, et al
as 20-35172
Defendant:
BRYAN KING, DOC Food Program Manager & CRCC Facility Food Manager, KERRI MCTARSNEY, Grievance Coordinator, SCCC, M. HOLTH, Grievance Coordinator, CBCC and others
Defendant / Appellee:
BERNARD WARNER, Secretary, DOC, PAT DOE 1, Religious Dietary Final Policy Makers, WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GAIL VINCENT
Wright v. State of Washington Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2019cv05279
Defendant:
Ron Haynes, State of Washington Department of Corrections, C Stone and others
Plaintiff:
Donald W Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Hughes v. Bovencamp et al
as 3:2018cv05717
Defendant:
J Ross, K Henry, K Sawyer and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Wayne Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fisher v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2018cv05544
Defendant:
Roy Gonzales, Ron Haynes, Robert Herzog and others
Plaintiff:
Curtis B Fisher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts v. State of Washington et al
as 4:2017cv05146
Plaintiff:
Joe J W Roberts
Defendant:
State of Washington, Mike Unck, Ureno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Gronseth et al
as 3:2016cv05775
Plaintiff:
Jess R. Smith
Defendant:
B Gronseth, Y Stubbs, S Frakes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vincent v. Stewart et al
as 3:2016cv05023
Plaintiff:
Gail Vincent
Defendant:
Belinda Stewart, Washington State Department of Corrections, Bernard Warner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. Pacholke et al
as 3:2012cv05048
Plaintiff:
Edward Joseph Nelson
Defendant:
Dan Pacholke, Pat Glebe, Ron Fraker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
