Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Mays v. Paul
as 5:2023cv00093
Petitioner:
Marcello M Mays
Respondent:
Warden Paul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mays v. Warden Paul
as 5:2023cv00078
Plaintiff:
Marcello M Mays
Defendant:
Warden Paul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Drayton v. Newman et al
as 7:2022cv00574
Plaintiff:
Lamont D. Drayton
Defendant:
Sgt. Newman, S. M. Snead, J. Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
May, Edith v. Yeates, Lisa et al
as 3:2022cv00296
Plaintiff:
Edith M. May
Defendant:
Lisa Yeates, Robert Foreman, Timothy McMahon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
May, Edith v. Yeats, Lisa et al
as 3:2022cv00243
Plaintiff:
Edith M. May
Defendant:
Lisa Yeats, Robert Foreman and Records Dept WWRC Employees (John/Jane Does)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
May v. State of New Mexico
as 2:2022cv00302
Petitioner:
Brandon M. May
Respondent:
State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Edith May v. State of Wisconsin, et al
as 22-1617
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDITH M. MAY
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF WISCONSIN, CITY OF KENOSHA, WISCONSIN, CITY OF KENOSHA POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Rivera v. Anderson et al
as 7:2022cv00182
Defendant:
M. D. Sturgill, David Anderson, Harold W. Clarke and others
Plaintiff:
Denis A. Rivera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
May, Edith v. Hassan, Fatah et al
as 3:2022cv00129
Plaintiff:
Edith M May and Edith M. May
Defendant:
Fatah Hassan, (HSU) Health Services Unit, HSU Manager Radcliff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
May, Edith v. State of Wisconsin et al
as 3:2022cv00130
Plaintiff:
Edith M May and Edith M. May
Defendant:
State of Wisconsin and Warden McDermott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
