Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Moran v. LA Dept of Pub Sfty & Corr
as 22-30787
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Quinten M. Moran
Defendant / Appellee:
Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections, Kirt D. Guerin, Walter Gerald and others
Moran v. LA. Department Of Public Safety & Corrections et al
as 3:2022cv00512
Plaintiff:
Quinten M. Moran
Defendant:
LA. Department Of Public Safety & Corrections, Kirt D Guerin, Walter Gerald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moran v. LeBlanc et al
as 5:2019cv00114
Defendant:
Chris Evans, LA Dept of Public Safety & Corrections, James LeBlanc and others
Plaintiff:
Quinten M Moran
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moran v. LeBlanc et al
as 5:2017cv01254
Plaintiff:
Quinten M Moran
Defendant:
James M LeBlanc, James Deville, Jerry W Goodwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moran et al v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC et al
as 4:2016cv01592
Plaintiff:
Ronald J Moran and Jean M Moran
Defendant:
Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC and The Bank of New York Mellon f/k/a the Bank of New York, as Trustee, for CWABS, Inc., Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2002-5
Counter_claimant:
The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation and Ocwen Financial Corporation
Counter_defendant:
Ocwen Financial Corporation and The Bank of New York Mellon f/k/a the Bank of New York, as Trustee, for CWABS, Inc., Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 2002-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Quinten Moran v. Timmy Ducote, Warden
as 16-30123
Petitioner - Appellant:
QUINTEN M. MORAN
Respondent - Appellee:
TIMMY DUCOTE, Warden
Moran v. Ducote
as 2:2014cv01210
Plaintiff:
Quinten M Moran
Defendant:
Timmy Ducote
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Moran v. Jackson Parish Correctional Center
as 5:2014cv00921
Plaintiff:
Quinten M Moran
Defendant:
Warden Jackson Parish Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
