Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Smith v. Interstate Commission of Adult Offender Supervision et al
as 2:2017cv04770
Defendant: Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Ken Christesen, Unknown Bobchak and others
Plaintiff: Cheri Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benge #137719 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2016cv00914
Plaintiff: Robert Joseph Benge
Defendant: Charles L Ryan, Richard Pratt, Christine A Sparacino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shari Beneda et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv04267
Plaintiff: John Beneda, Shari Beneda, Doris Cater and others
Defendant: Does, McKesson Corporation and Pfizer Inc.
FTC v. AMG Services, Inc., et al
as 14-16468
Plaintiff - Appellee: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Defendant - Appellant: AMG SERVICES, INC., RED CEDAR SERVICES, INC., DBA 500FastCash, SFS, INC., DBA OneClickCash and others
Defendant: AMG CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC, LEVEL 5 MOTORSPORTS, LLC, LEADFLASH CONSULTING, LLC and others
Hartford Life and Accident Ins v. Shaneil Tucker, et al
as 12-56701
Plaintiff - Appellee: HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant: GERALDINE HARVEY-LEONARD, ALBERT S. BEAMON and ROBERT L. BEAMON
Defendant - Appellant: SHANEIL M. TUCKER
Type: Contract Insurance
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company v. Harvey-Leonard et al
as 3:2011cv01544
Plaintiff: Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Defendant: Geraldine Harvey-Leonard, Albert S. Beamon, Shaneil M. Tucker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Type: Contract Insurance
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01960
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Michael Edie v. William Bratton, et al
as 08-56108
Plaintiff - Appellant: MICHAEL ANTHONEY EDIE
Defendant - Appellee: WILLIAM BRATTON, WILLIE WILLIAMS, Ex Chief of Police, YOUNG, Police Officer and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?