Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Williams v. Koerner et al
as 2:2023cv02172
Plaintiff:
Anna M Williams
Defendant:
Todd D Koerner and The City of Kankakee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. City Of Joliet, a municipal corporation et al
as 1:2020cv05367
Plaintiff:
Victor M Williams
Defendant:
Robert O'Dekirk, City Of Joliet and Uknown Joliet Police Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv07031
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01255
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
ASSIST INC. et al v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 2:2016cv00271
Plaintiff:
ASSIST INC. and DIANNA M. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
BUREAU OF REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, DIVISION OF DISABILITY AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICES, MAJDI EL-ALAMI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tracy Williams v. Brandon Brooks, et al
as 15-1763
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TRACY M. WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
BRANDON BROOKS, in his individual capacity, GREG KEHL, in his individual capacity and SHANNON TRUMP, in her individual capacity
WILLIAMS v. BROOKS et al
as 1:2013cv01592
Defendant:
BRANDON BROOKS, GREG KEHL and SHANNON TRUMP
Plaintiff:
TRACY M. WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv06845
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00402
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Davis v. Williams
as 1:2008cv00037
Plaintiff:
Travis Davis
Defendant:
M Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
