Cases 1 - 10 of 40
(PS) Rhee v. Medical Board of CA, et al
as 2:2023cv00438
Plaintiff:
Hanna Q. Rhee
Defendant:
Medical Board of California, Xavier Becerra, Kimberly Kirchmeyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, its assignees and/or successors v. Alvarez et al
as 3:2022cv06043
Plaintiff:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, its assignees and/or successors
Defendant:
Ana M Alvarez, John Teller and Sara Teller
Johnathan Harper v. David Robinson, et al
as 22-16450
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHNATHAN SETH HARPER
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID ROBINSON, DAVID PUTNAM, CRYSTAL THOMAS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv09514
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
(PC) Harper v. Robinson, et al.
as 1:2021cv01364
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Seth Harper
Defendant:
David Robinson, David Putnam, Crystal Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ahjeeb Jamal Boyd Jr. v. Neil McDowell
as 2:2021cv05616
Plaintiff:
Ahjeeb Jamal Boyd, Jr.
Defendant:
Neil McDowell, E. Winbush, F. Duenas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Luis M. Alvarez v. Andrew Saul
as 2:2019cv08584
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Luis M Alvarez and Luis M. Alvarez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
(PC) McElroy v. Ramos et al
as 2:2018cv02771
Defendant:
Walker, B. Hedrick, D. Mensing and others
Plaintiff:
Latwahn McElroy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PS) Rhee v. Medical Board of California et al
as 2:2018cv00105
Defendant:
John T. Harris, Joe Cunha, Roberto Moya and others
Plaintiff:
Hanna Q. Rhee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jose Espinoza v. Debbie Asuncion, et al
as 17-16939
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE JUAN ESPINOZA
Defendant - Appellee:
DEBBIE ASUNCION, Warden, N. WALKER, Correctional Captain, L. M. PENNISI, Jr., Correctional Lieutenant and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
